← Back to main resultsNo-Shift vs. Filler: compares BOLD activity on No-Shift trials (a sentence continuing the current situation, no update required) against fillerOn trials (ordinary reading, no probe or shift nearby) — a non-retrieval, non-updating baseline. This was run as an alternative check on whether age effects elsewhere in the DMN reflect retrieval/updating demand specifically, rather than a generic difference in how young and older adults process any narrative text. It complements, but does not replace, the No-Shift-vs-zero baseline analysis reported in Appendix C.
How to read this map: there is data from too many parcels to visualize individually. To summarize the neural profiles, parcels have been grouped into clusters (k-means) by the similarity of their activity. This grouping is for visualization only and does not reflect any functional hypothesis. Click an individual parcel to see its own activity.